Problems
The Great Pacific Garbage Patch: key facts
- Location: Roughly 135°W-155°W, 35°N-42°N, in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre between California and Hawaii. - Size: An estimated 1.6 million km² — about twice the size of Texas, or three times the size of France by some estimates. - Contents: An estimated 1.8 trillion pieces of plastic, roughly 80,000 tonnes in total. - Discovered: 1997, by racing boat captain and oceanographer Charles Moore, while sailing back from a Los Angeles-to-Hawaii race. - Formed by: Ocean currents in the North Pacific Gyre, which concentrate floating debris — much of it originating from land-based sources — into a slow-circulating mass. - Cleanup status: As of March 2026, The Ocean Cleanup has removed more than 50 million kilograms of trash across its global operations using its System 03 platform.
Marine pollution
The Great Pacific garbage patch formed gradually as a result of ocean or marine pollution gathered by ocean currents. It occupies a relatively stationary region of the North Pacific Ocean bounded by the North Pacific Gyre in the horse latitudes. The gyre's rotational pattern draws in waste material from across the North Pacific, incorporating coastal waters off North America and Japan. As the material is captured in the currents, wind-driven surface currents gradually move debris toward the center, trapping it. There are obvious manifestations of the impact of a giant accumulation of plastic in the middle of the ocean. For example, sea animals - turtles, and dolphins - get entangled in non-rotting fishing nets. Of course, they are not able to take them off - if the net is wrapped around the legs and neck of a young turtle, when it grows up, the net will strangle it. In addition, small hollow products (caps from plastic bottles, for example) appetizingly shine on the water surface and often become prey for fish and birds, clogging their stomachs up and condemning the animals to a painful death. Volunteer groups on the shores of the Pacific Ocean are trying to combat this by catching the birds and giving them vomiting medication to cleanse their bodies. But, of course, not everyone can be saved. As a result, the millions of birds living there - about 90 percent - already have plastic inside them.
Improper waste disposal or management of trash
According to a 2011 EPA report, a major source of marine debris is improper disposal or management of trash and debris products, including plastics. Debris is generated on land at marinas, ports, rivers, harbors, docks, and storm drains. Garbage also enters the sea from fishing boats, fixed platforms, and cargo ships. The constituent particles range in size from abandoned fishing nets several miles long to microgranules used in cosmetics and abrasive cleaners.
Plastic garbage affects human health
The greatest danger is microplastics, which are produced by the destruction of polymers - because they can not decompose, only disintegrate into smaller and smaller pieces. When plastic breaks down in the sun, it releases phthalates which are oncogenic substances, i.e. they can cause cancer. Some types of polymers can release bisphenols, which affect sexual functions, including humans. In the trash, however, everything is boiled in the sun and decays under the influence of microorganisms, which, building colonies on the plastic, form microcracks on it, and on top of that, toxins are absorbed on the cracked surface. All this ends up in clams and fish, and at the other end of the food chain is the man. And people eat mussels and oysters together with plastic, which itself will sooner or later leave the body, but will leave poisons in it, which can cause complications in hormonal and other systems in people.
Solutions
Ocean Cleaning System 001
Of the active attempts to do something, one could mention the System 001 ocean cleaning system, developed by the Dutch company The Ocean Cleanup, a kind of barrier limiting the spread of plastic. According to the idea, it was a self-orienting U-shaped system, functioning with the help of natural factors, which collects plastic inside itself and does not allow it to leave the pollution zone. But even its performance has been criticized. A second modification (System 002) is now being developed as part of the project, but there is still a long way to go before the work is completed. At the same time, there are already technologies that can solve the problem of marine plastic. After all, the utilization of plastic waste on land is a long and successfully solved problem.
Continuous pyrolysis of UTD-2
The quality of plastic, which has been in the water for a long time, of course, will not allow the application of recycling technologies, but for omnivorous thermal technologies, it will not be a problem. A suggested (even impending) solution to the problem: is continuous pyrolysis unit UTD-2. Let us remind you that the essence of the pyrolysis technological process consists heating of the feedstock in an oxygen-deficient atmosphere and following evaporation, cracking, and condensation of the hydrocarbon compounds. Not all types of waste should be recycled by the pyrolysis method, but plastic waste lends itself to the pyrolysis process in the best way possible, with the formation of a maximum useful product and minimum waste in the process. The useful product in the case of plastic recycling is pyrolysis fuel, which is used to maintain the temperature of the process. Due to the high calorific value of the plastic waste the unit will quickly reach the regime and then the plastic waste will recycle itself, and this puts pyrolysis unit UTD-2 out of competition in economic efficiency. There is even enough fuel for electric power generation, and it will not be superfluous on the ship. The tandem of the UTD-2 and the Capstone turbine has already been successfully tested; the generator produced its maximum output during the tests. Transporting waste to the unit or the unit to the waste - this issue in the case of UTD-2 is solved unambiguously. The equipment in its most extended version is mounted in standard 40-foot shipping containers, and placing it on any vessel, even a small tonnage, will not be a problem. The unit has proven to work well on land, and will of course require modifications for sea conditions, especially stormy ones, as the nature of the Pacific Ocean does not do justice to its name at all. On the other hand, due to dissipation by sea winds, the already environmentally friendly installation will cause a minimum of questions regarding the environmental load on the atmosphere.
A system of the ocean cleaning from garbage by autonomous platforms
In 2014, Bojan Slat, a 19-year-old student from the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, presented a system for cleaning the ocean of debris with autonomous platforms that float freely in the ocean and catch the debris with flood barriers. Three years earlier, Slat had been diving off the coast of Greece, and he became very excited about the fact that there were more bags than jellyfish floating in the Mediterranean Sea. He decided to dedicate his life to solving the problem of cleaning up the ocean, and along with a team of like-minded people, he did extensive research and raised over $2 million to continue the work through crowdfunding. Their method uses natural ocean currents and winds that passively carry debris to a collection platform. Solid floating barriers are then used to catch and focus trash from the ocean, eliminating the risk of entangling fish and other wildlife that has happened when collecting trash by other methods, such as nets. Although the method is not cheap (it takes about 32 million euros a year to implement), it is many times cheaper than other proposed cleaning methods.
Gallery
9Timelines
2026
May
New research shows the patch has become its own ecosystem. Scientists studied 105 pieces of the plastic and found 46 different species of small sea creatures living on them. About 80% of those species normally live near the coast, but they now appear to be breeding out in the open ocean, on the trash itself. This means cleanup isn't just removing garbage anymore — it's also removing a habitat that has grown on top of it.
2025
Not everyone agrees the cleanup approach itself is a good idea. Independent ocean-plastic researchers — including Dr. Miriam Goldstein (National Ocean Protection Coalition), Marcus Eriksen (5 Gyres), and physical oceanographer Dr. Kim Martini — have raised real concerns: that surface-collecting devices can trap and kill marine life along with the plastic, that only a small share of ocean plastic actually floats where these systems can reach it, and that money spent on removal might do more good stopping plastic at the source. NOAA adds a separate, simpler correction: the patch isn't a solid island of trash — it's mostly tiny fragments spread through the water, "like flecks of pepper in a bowl of soup," and it's one of several such patches around the Pacific, not the only one.
2024
September
The Ocean Cleanup gives its first real cost and time estimate for cleaning the whole patch: $7.5 billion over 10 years, or $4 billion over 5 years if things go more efficiently. At this point, only about 500,000 kg has been removed from the patch since 2019 — roughly 0.5% of the 100 million kg of plastic believed to be there. Because that pace is too slow, they pause collection trips through 2025 to instead map exactly where the plastic is thickest, so future trips can collect more each time.
2023
August
The Ocean Cleanup aims to remove 90% of floating plastic from the oceans by 2040, which they believe is achievable, Tobin said. The nonprofit has a two-pronged approach of removing "legacy plastics" and debris before the UV rays break the material down into microplastics, which are nearly impossible to collect. One of the most remarkable items they have pulled is a Vietnam War-era canteen. Other common materials are rigid plastics that float into the ocean and fishing nets, Tobin said. The system involves two vessels that have a device that skims the water to collect all of the debris. The environmental group is also working to clear the rivers that feed into the oceans of trash as well to ensure they can clean as much as possible. By the end of the month, The Ocean Cleanup will launch System 03, a larger version of its current system of floating barriers. Its predecessor, System 02, which was utilized in the most recent mission, is about 875 yards long. The new replacement measures about 2.400 yards long, which will lead to much bigger and more successful catches, Tobin said. System 03 is capable of clearing the size of a football field every five seconds, about twice the speed of the current system, Tobin said. The Ocean Cleanup's "System 03" will be nearly three times as long as the previous system, enabling much more trash pickup. The nonprofit has also been using artificial intelligence computational modeling to locate where the most plastic is in the ocean -- a method they named "plastic hotspot modeling." During the week-long journey from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch back to port, the trash gets sorted on the ship, and the nonprofit recycles as much material as possible. The nonprofit then works with partners worldwide to ensure that the products made with the recycled plastic will not end up back in oceans or rivers, Tobin said, adding that one of those partnerships is with a Korean car manufacturer that uses the plastics in the construction of electric vehicles. "We just want to make sure it doesn't end up back where we found it," Tobin said.
April
Independent scientists publish the first real evidence that the patch has become its own ecosystem. Marine biologist Linsey Haram (then at the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center) and Jim Carlton (Williams College) examine over 100 pieces of plastic and find 484 small sea creatures on them. About 70% of the debris carries at least one species that normally lives near the coast rather than in the open ocean, and some of them show signs of breeding at sea. The researchers coined the term "neopelagic community" for this new, plastic-based habitat.
2022
July 15
Discovery of a thriving ecosystem of life at the Great Pacific garbage patch in 2022 suggested that cleaning up garbage here may adversely remove this plastisphere. In July of 2022, The Ocean Cleanup announced that they had reached a milestone of removing the first 100,000 kg of plastic from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch using "System 002" and announced their transition to "System 03", which is claimed to be 10 times as effective as its predecessor.
March 02
The UN Environment Assembly passed a historic resolution to end plastic pollution and create the world’s first global plastic pollution treaty by 2024 – a legally binding agreement that would address the full life cycle of plastic, from its production and design to its disposal.
2021
July 01
In 2021, The Ocean Cleanup collected 63,182 pounds (28,658 kg) of plastic using their "System 002". The mission started in July 2021 and concluded on October 14, 2021. After redesigning the system several times, the organization calls it "proven technology." This means the design finally works well enough to build larger, permanent systems rather than testing prototypes.
2020
January 01
In 2020 over the course of 2 expeditions, Ocean Voyages Institute again set the record for largest cleanup in the "Garbage Patch" removing over 170 tons (340,000 pounds) of plastic from the ocean. The first 45 day expedition removed 103 tons of plastic and the second expedition removed over 67 tons of plastic from the Garbage Patch.
2019
January 01
The Ocean Cleanup collects its first plastic directly from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. It uses an early version of a system that lets ocean currents gather the trash together, instead of chasing it with boats.
2018
September 09
On 9 September 2018, the first collection system was deployed to the gyre to begin the collection task. This initial trial run of the Ocean Cleanup Project started towing its "Ocean Cleanup System 001" from San Francisco to a trial site some 240 nautical miles (260 miles) away. The initial trial of the "Ocean Cleanup System 001" ran for four months and provided the research team with valuable information relevant to the designing of the "System 001/B".
2013
April 11
On April 11, 2013, in order to raise awareness, the artist Maria Cristina Finucci founded the State with Landfill at UNESCO - Paris in the presence of the Director-General Irina Bokova . This is the first of a series of events held under the patronage of UNESCO and the Italian Ministry of Environment.
2012
July 01
In July/August 2012 Ocean Voyages Institute conducted a voyage from San Francisco to the Eastern limits of the North Pacific Gyre north, (ultimately ending in Richmond British Columbia) and then made a return voyage that also visited the Gyre. The focus of this expedition was surveying the extent of tsunami debris from the Japanese earthquake tsunami. In 2012, researchers Goldstein, Rosenberg, and Cheng found that microplastic concentrations in the gyre had increased by two orders of magnitude in the prior four decades.
2010
January 01
In 2010, Ocean Voyages Institute conducted a 30-day expedition in the gyre which continued the science from the 2009 expeditions and tested prototype cleanup devices.
2009
January 01
In 2009, two project vessels from Project Kaisei/Ocean Voyages Institute; the New Horizon and the Kaisei, embarked on a voyage to research the patch and determine the feasibility of commercial-scale collection and recycling. The Scripps Institute of Oceanography's 2009 SEAPLEX expedition in part funded by Ocean Voyages Institute/Project Kaisei also researched the patch. Researchers were also looking at the impact of plastic on mesopelagic fish, such as lanternfish. In August 2009, the Scripps Institution of Oceanography/Project Kaisei SEAPLEX survey mission of the Gyre found that plastic debris was present in 100 consecutive samples taken at varying depths and net sizes along a path of 1,700 miles (2,700 km) through the patch. The survey found that, although the patch contains large pieces, it is made up of smaller items that increase in concentration toward the gyre's centre, and tcenterconfetti-like' pieces are visible just beneath the surface suggest the affected area may be much smaller. 2009 data collected from Pacific albatross populations suggest the presence of two distinct debris zones. In 2009 Ocean Voyages Institute removed over 5 tons of plastic during the initial Project Kaisei cleanup initiative while testing a variety of cleanup prototype devices.
2008
August 28
In 2008, the JUNK Raft Project was organized by Dr. Markus Eriksen, Joel Paschal, and Anna Cummins in Long Beach, California, to bring attention to the problem of plastic pollution at the Great Pacific landfill. Organizers hoped to "creatively raise awareness of plastic trash and pollution in the ocean,", especially in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch was trapped in the North Pacific Gyre, sailing 2,600 miles across the Pacific Ocean on a 30-foot (9.1 m) raft made from an old Cessna 310 Fuselage aircraft and six pontoons filled with 15,000 old plastic bottles. The crew, led by Dr. Marcus Eriksen of the Foundation and filmmaker Joel Pascal, departed Long Beach, California on June 1, 2008, arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 28. 2008.
1997
January 01
Charles J. Moore, returning home through the North Pacific Gyre after competing in the Transpacific Yacht Race in 1997, claimed to have come upon an enormous stretch of floating debris. Moore alerted oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer, who subsequently dubbed the region the "Eastern Garbage Patch" (EGP). The area is frequently featured in media reports as an exceptional example of marine pollution.
1988
January 01
The Great Pacific garbage patch was described in a 1988 paper published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The description was based on research by several Alaska-based researchers in 1988 who measured neustonic plastic in the North Pacific Ocean. Researchers found relatively high concentrations of marine debris accumulating in regions governed by ocean currents. Extrapolating from findings in the Sea of Japan, the researchers hypothesized that similar conditions would occur in other parts of the Pacific where prevailing currents were favorable to the creation of relatively stable waters. They specifically indicated the North Pacific Gyre.
Videos
References
Hot spot on the map
FAQ
What is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch?
It's a large area of concentrated marine debris in the North Pacific Ocean, formed where circulating currents (a gyre) trap floating trash in a stable center. It's also called the Pacific Trash Vortex. It's made of two zones—the "Eastern Garbage Patch" between California and Hawaii, and the "Western Garbage Patch" extending from Japan toward Hawaii.
Where is it located?
In the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, roughly between Hawaii and California.
How big is it?
A 2018 peer-reviewed study estimated it spans about 1.6 million km² — roughly 2.5 times the size of France, or twice the size of Texas — containing an estimated 1.8 trillion plastic pieces weighing about 79,000 tonnes.
Is it really a solid "patch" or "island" of trash?
No. This is the single biggest misconception. It's not a visible island of floating garbage — it's a diffuse debris field. You can sail through parts of it and see very little on the surface, because most of the debris is dispersed plastic fragments, not an intact mass. The average concentration is around 60 kg per km², peaking at a few hundred kg per km² in denser zones.
Can you see it from space?
No. About 94% of the debris (by count) is minute plastic fragments too small to be visible from orbit or aerial photos — despite the claim circulating online.
What is it made of?
A mix of large and small debris: abandoned/derelict fishing nets and gear, hard plastic objects, and microplastics (pieces under 5mm). By mass, roughly 92% of the debris is larger objects rather than tiny fragments — three-quarters of total mass is macro- and mega-plastic, much of it rigid polyethylene, polypropylene, and fishing gear.
Are most of the pieces really tiny microplastics?
By count, yes — most individual pieces are microplastics. But by weight, no — most of the mass is concentrated in larger objects like nets and rigid plastic, not the tiny fragments.
What causes it / where does the plastic come from?
Debris enters the ocean from land (via wind, rain, storm drains, and rivers) and from marine sources. A 2018 study found 75–86% of the plastic in the GPGP by mass comes from fishing and agricultural activity (nets, ropes, gear) rather than household litter.
How is the patch formed?
Rotating ocean currents in the gyre pull floating debris toward a relatively calm, stable center, where it becomes trapped rather than washing back to shore.
What's the difference between microplastics and macroplastics, and why do they matter?
Macroplastics are larger, visible plastic objects; microplastics are fragments under 5mm, often formed as bigger pieces break down. Microplastics are especially concerning because they're easily ingested by marine life and can enter the food chain.
How does it affect marine life?
Animals ingest plastic (mistaking it for food) or become entangled in derelict fishing nets ("ghost nets"). Estimates vary by source, but tens of thousands to over 100,000 marine animals are estimated to be injured, strangled, or killed by plastic debris annually. Sea turtles caught near the patch have been found with up to 74% of their diet (by dry weight) made up of ocean plastic. Surface plastic in the patch outweighs marine life there by roughly 180 to 1.What are the long-term effects of this pollution?
Plastic breaks down into microplastics and eventually nanoplastics rather than fully biodegrading, so it persists in the water column and marine food web for decades, with impacts on marine ecosystems, fisheries, and potentially human health through the food chain.
Is anyone actually cleaning it up?
Yes. The Ocean Cleanup, a nonprofit, has been actively removing plastic from the GPGP since July 2021 (System 002), and has operated System 03 there since August 2023 as its current cleanup technology.
Can the ocean ever be rid of plastic entirely?
Realistically, no — not entirely, and not on their own. Cleanup organizations describe their systems as part of a broader strategy that has to be paired with reducing new plastic entering the ocean in the first place, not a standalone fix.
How long would it take to clean up the whole gyre?
Estimates depend heavily on technology scale-up and funding; organizations doing this work generally frame the current systems as a proof of concept and blueprint for future scale-up rather than a fixed timeline for full cleanup.
Does cleanup technology harm marine life?
Organizations running these systems say they design around this risk (e.g., mesh sizing, avoiding sensitive-species zones, environmental impact assessments) and conduct ongoing monitoring, but incidental bycatch is a genuine, actively studied concern — not a solved problem.
Who's responsible for cleaning it up?
There's no single answer — responsibility is generally framed as shared between the nations/industries whose waste (especially fishing gear) ends up there, plastic producers, and international cooperation, alongside nonprofit cleanup efforts.
Are there other garbage patches besides this one?
Yes. Similar debris accumulation zones exist in other ocean gyres, including the South Pacific, North Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Indian Ocean.
What can an individual do to help?
Reduce single-use plastic consumption, support extended producer responsibility (EPR) policies, participate in or fund cleanup/prevention efforts, and properly dispose of or recycle waste to keep it out of waterways in the first place.
Will cleaning the patch just encourage more pollution ("moral hazard")?
This is a common objection. Cleanup organizations generally argue that prevention (stopping plastic at the source, especially in rivers) and cleanup (removing what's already there) are complementary, not substitutes — cleanup alone doesn't solve ongoing input, so both need to happen together.
















