- hot-spots
- toxic waste
- USA
- Pollution in Lake Superior

Problems
Over the last 30 years, concentrations of nearly all measured contaminants in fish and the water column have declined in Lake Superior, with the exception of toxaphene. Between 1986 and 1997, concentrations of toxic organic pollutants in the water column declined by more than 50 percent. However, dieldrin, mercury, PCBs, and toxaphene concentrations in Lake Superior continue to exceed the most stringent water quality standards. Because of its remote location, limited industrial activity, and large surface area to watershed ratio, Lake Superior receives most of its contaminant loadings via atmospheric deposition, especially concerning PCBs, mercury, and toxaphene. Canada’s prairie provinces and the southern United States appear to be sources of lindane to Lake Superior.
Shoreline development
Development of the shoreline, including the construction of recreational homes, is one of the most pressing issues facing Lake Superior. For example, the Keweenaw Peninsula has seen unprecedented growth in the past 20 years with 50 percent of the homes now classified as recreational or second homes.
Habitat loss
Although Lake Superior's nearshore and open water habitats are of high quality and promote an abundance of trout, whitefish, and herring, habitat loss in tributaries and embayments is a concern. Most of the habitat loss in Lake Superior has occurred in these areas, including the eight Areas of Concern. These tributaries are significantly degraded by agriculture, mining, hydroelectric dams, industrial effluents, and waste, wetland dredging and filling, non-point source pollution, shoreline development, and land use practices that increase surface runoff and erosion. Habitat loss and harvest and management of select species have caused dramatic changes to wildlife communities over the past 150 years. Eighteen animal species in the Lake Superior watershed, including mammals, birds, insects, reptiles, and amphibians, are listed as endangered by the federal government. In addition, 400 species (300 of which are plants) are listed by provincial or state jurisdictions as endangered, threatened, or of special concern.
Non-native invasive species
Lake Superior has the highest ratio of non-native invasive species to native species of all the Great Lakes. Sea lampreys kill thousands of lake trout each year. Invasive round goby and ruffe fishes have colonized some nearshore habitats and could negatively impact the nearshore cool-water fish community. Other invasive species predicted to have significant impacts on the native community include the gypsy moth, emerald ash borer, Asian longhorned beetle, rusty crayfish, and exotic buckthorns.
Wetland loss and degradation
Wetlands account for 15 percent of the Lake Superior basin in the United States and up to 25 percent in Canada. The greatest threats to Lake Superior's remaining wetlands are wetland draining and filling, toxic contamination, water level regulation and site-specific stresses such as shoreline development. Other threats include invasive species and diminished water quality.
Forest fragmentation
Forest fragmentation and changes in forest composition are two of the seminal changes to the Lake Superior region since settlement times. In the 1880s, Lake Superior forests in the United States were almost entirely clear-cut. Aspen, birch, fir, and poplar have increased since this time while spruce and pines have been severely reduced. Forest cover is anticipated to remain the same or to increase slightly in future years. Hardwood forest fragmentation will continue to increase due to development and road construction.
Solutions
Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative, Lake Superior Binational Program
Author: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
The challenge with Lake Superior is to keep it as clean as it is now and to clean up the problems that have been found. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is tackling the restoration and protection of Lake Superior through a variety of approaches. Our Lake Superior programs include the following: Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative: As part of an effort between Great Lakes states and the U.S. EPA, the MPCA passed water quality regulations that apply to toxic chemicals in the Lake Superior watershed. Lake Superior Binational Program: This collaborative program has focused on the entire ecosystem of Lake Superior, its air, land, water, and human and wildlife. As one of the partners in this program, the MPCA is striving for zero discharge and zero emission of nine toxic chemicals from sources in the Lake Superior basin.
Source: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air-water-land-climate/lake-superior-water-quality-monitoring
Gallery
4Timelines
2019
According to Canada's National Pollutant Release Inventory, the pulp mill, AV Terrace Bay, continues to release polluting chemicals into Lake Superior. The data for 2019 reports arsenic, lead, phosphorus, nitrate, hexavalent chromium, and six other pollutants.
2005
Monitoring in Lake Superior in 2005 - 2006 emphasizes critical pollutants and the lower food web. Rehabilitation of critical aquatic habitats is underway and several wildlife and fish species have been restored.
1987
In 1987 when Canada and the United States designated 43 polluted locations as the Great Lakes Areas of Concern, eight were on Lake Superior. Despite its relatively low pollution levels, Lake Superior continues to face environmental challenges. These include invasive species such as zebra mussels and quagga mussels, which can disrupt the lake's ecosystem.
1970
Concerns about pollution in Lake Superior and other Great Lakes lead to the passage of the Clean Water Act and the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
1962
The first Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is signed between the U.S. and Canada. This agreement sets goals for reducing pollution in the Great Lakes, including Lake Superior.
1955
Reserve mining began discharging to Lake Superior in 1955. Rock waste, or “tailings” slurry, contained approximately 40% of asbestos fibers. For many years, concern over this discharge continued to grow. In fact, this was an early example of a “binational” problem about Lake Superior. The issue gained extremely high attention in the media and among residents of Lake Superior cities like Duluth, Thunder Bay, Marquette, and Sault Ste. Marie became very aware of the Reserve Mining situation.